What it takes to qualify for a GPU loan: the lender’s checklist
What lenders check before approving a GPU loan, in the order they check it: the customer contract, the node, the sponsor, power and the structure. Plus the three mistakes that kill most deals.
Marek Omilian, CFAManaging Partner, GPU Capital
Key takeaways
- The customer contract repays the loan, so lenders treat it as the primary source of repayment. They read it first and the hardware second.
- The cleanest loan matures inside the contract and is sized on the contract rate, not the spot rate.
- Three mistakes kill most deals: a loan longer than the contract, no signed power agreement, and one weak customer for everything.
- Before the first call, check that the loan ends no later than the customer contract, the power agreement and the colocation agreement.
Contents
A GPU loan gets approved on the contract, not on the hardware. I see financing requests every week, and the ones that die mostly die on the first call, for the same few reasons. Here is the checklist I would hand a borrower before that call, in the order a lender works through it.
1. The offtake
GPUs lose value every year. The customer contract is what repays the loan, so lenders treat it as the primary source of repayment. They read it first and the hardware second.
We start with four questions. Who is the customer, and can they pay for the full term? How long is the contract? Is it take-or-pay, meaning the customer owes the money whether or not it uses the capacity? Has any of it been prepaid?
Counterparty credit sets everything downstream. CoreWeave’s $8.5 billion DDTL 4.0 facility was written to fund previously contracted services for a leading AI enterprise, and it became the first HPC delayed draw term loan to earn an investment-grade rating, A3 / A (low). A smaller operator will not get that. The principle holds at any size.
Term matters just as much. The cleanest loan matures inside the contract. CoreWeave has since closed a facility with roughly a five-year maturity against customer contracts averaging about three years, and says plainly that those lenders are taking renewal risk. That is a public company with billions in contracted revenue. I would not plan on the same treatment for a small operator. Those financings differ greatly in size, structure and credit quality from ours.
Lenders also size the loan on the contract rate, not the spot rate. Silicon Data’s B200 index stood at $5.69 per GPU-hour on September 7, and the 12-month term rate was $5.39, about 5% lower (our math). The sizing follows the lower number.
A customer prepayment cuts the lender’s exposure and shows the customer means it. We wrote up how those deals are built in our post on long-tenor prepaid GPU contracts.
2. The hardware
Lenders value the asset as a whole node. An 8-GPU H100 system runs roughly $250,000 to $320,000 in 2026 price guides, and that is the figure a lender haircuts, not a per-card price.
Then the questions. Which generation is it? The H100 rental index reads $2.53 per GPU-hour today against $5.69 for B200, so an older node earns less and gets a shorter loan. How old is it, and what is the exact spec: memory, networking, CPU, HGX or PCIe? Where does it sit? The lender needs the country and the facility, and has to know it could repossess and re-lease the node there. Who maintains it? OEM warranty, spares on site and remote hands all matter, because a node that sits broken earns nothing.
Which generation to buy is a separate question. Our post on which GPU server pays back fastest covers it.
3. The sponsor
Lenders back operators who have run GPUs before. They ask how many nodes you have run, for how long, and for whom. They ask for uptime history, and they want it from your monitoring system and your customers’ SLA reports, not from a slide.
Then comes power. They want the power agreement and the colo agreement, signed, sized to the megawatts you need, and running at least as long as the loan. Without power there is no cash flow.
A first-time operator can still get financed. The lender will want protection somewhere else: a stronger customer, a larger prepayment, or a smaller advance.
4. The structure
Four terms do most of the work. The advance rate is the share of node cost the lender funds, and it moves with contract quality and node age. Amortization should repay the principal inside the contract term, so nobody is counting on a renewal. Reserves are usually a debt service reserve of a few months, held in cash. The cash sweep sends excess cash to the lender instead of the sponsor when a customer pays late or the contract nears its end. Borrowers push back on the sweep. A lender looking at an unlet tail will ask for one anyway.
Pricing depends on your tier, and our post on cost of capital by tier covers it.
Where borrowers lose deals
Three mistakes account for most of the losses I see.
The loan term is longer than the contract term. A borrower asks for five years against a three-year contract, and the lender is now underwriting a renewal. A large issuer can get that done. Most borrowers cannot.
There is no power agreement. A customer contract with no signed power behind it is a promise to deliver capacity you cannot yet run. Lenders see that at once.
One customer for everything. Concentration is fine when that customer is investment grade and take-or-pay. It kills the deal when the one customer is a startup with a thin balance sheet and a right to terminate.
The checklist
| What lenders check | The question behind it | Typical red flag |
|---|---|---|
| Customer credit | Can the customer pay for the whole term? | Unrated startup, no financials, no parent guarantee |
| Contract term vs loan term | Does the loan end before the contract does? | Loan outlasts the contract |
| Take-or-pay and termination | What happens if the customer walks? | Termination for convenience, usage-based billing |
| Prepayment | How much cash is already in hand? | None, or refundable on demand |
| Node generation, age, spec | Will the node still earn at the end of the loan? | Older node, mixed spec, thin networking |
| Location and maintenance | Can we repossess, re-lease and keep it running? | Hard-to-enforce jurisdiction, no OEM warranty or spares |
| Operating record | Has this team run GPUs for a customer before? | No uptime history, no SLA reports |
| Power and colo | Is the power signed, sized and as long as the loan? | Letter of intent only, shorter than the loan |
| Structure | Does the loan repay inside the contract? | Balloon payment, no reserve, no sweep |
Source: GPU Capital.
What to have ready before the first call
Put these in one folder: the signed customer contract, including the termination and SLA clauses; the power and colo agreements; the hardware quote or purchase order with OEM spec and warranty terms; an uptime report for any fleet you already run; and a one-page summary of what you are buying, what you are asking to borrow, and what you are putting in yourself. If the customer is not rated, add whatever financial information you have on them.
The one thing to do this month
Write down three dates: when the customer contract ends, when the power agreement ends, and when the colo agreement ends. Your loan term should be no longer than the earliest of them. If that is shorter than the loan you want, you have found the problem before a lender did. Extend the weakest agreement or shorten the ask.
Sources
- CoreWeave, DDTL 4.0 8-K exhibit (March 2026) sec.gov
- CoreWeave, DDTL 5.5 press release (August 2026) investors.coreweave.com
- Silicon Data, B200 rental price update, August 2026 (SDB200RT spot and term structure) silicondata.com
- Silicon Data, H100 Rental Price Index (SDH100RT) silicondata.com
- CloudZero, H100 GPU cost guide (8-GPU system price range) cloudzero.com
- GPU Capital, long-tenor prepaid GPU contracts gpu-capital.com
- GPU Capital, which GPU server pays back fastest gpu-capital.com
- GPU Capital, cost of capital by tier gpu-capital.com
Quoted for market context. These companies are not affiliated with GPU Capital and do not endorse it.
Disclosure
This post is general market commentary for information only. It reflects the author’s views on the date shown, which may change. It is not investment advice, and it is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. GPU Capital, its funds or its affiliates may have relationships with, or interests in, companies or equipment mentioned.
Financing for GPU servers, sized for neoclouds.
$1M to $5M per deployment, as full-stack ownership or a first-lien or second-lien loan. You work directly with our Managing Partner, who makes credit decisions.
Financing is subject to our due diligence, credit approval, available capital and signed final agreements. Nothing on this website is a commitment to lend or lease.
Booking uses Calendly, a third-party scheduling service. Calendly’s privacy policy applies to the information you enter there.