B300 vs H200 vs RTX PRO 6000: which GPU server pays back fastest?
The payback math for three 8-GPU servers on the same three-year contract, and what breaks each case. The contract moves the answer more than the chip does.
Marek Omilian, CFAManaging Partner, GPU Capital
Key takeaways
- On a three-year contract with no prepayment, we estimate an 8-GPU RTX PRO 6000 or H200 node recovers its cost in about 22 months, and a B300 node in about 27.
- The contract moves payback more than the chip: tenor and prepayment swing it by 13 to 20 months, the choice of chip by 5 to 12.
- The H200 has the widest cushion. Its contract rate can fall 34% before payback passes 36 months, against 30% for the RTX PRO 6000 and 22% for the B300.
- Underwrite the contract and the price paid, not the chip. These are market estimates from public data, not results or projections for any investment.
Contents
The short version
On a three-year contract at today’s rates, the RTX PRO 6000 and the H200 pay back in a dead heat: about 22 months each. The B300 needs about 27. All three are our estimates, and the arithmetic is below.
Change the contract and the winner changes. The PRO 6000 wins when the customer prepays. The H200 wins when the market turns. The B300 wins nowhere at today’s rates.
The H200 wins on cushion. Its contract rate can fall 34% before payback slips past 36 months. The PRO 6000 can take 30%. The B300, 22%.
We see all three in our deal flow, and we underwrite them the same way: at the node. The 8-GPU server is what gets bought, racked, rented and financed.
Deal terms we assume
Every base-case number rests on one contract structure.
| Term | Assumption |
|---|---|
| Initial contract term | 36 months, all three nodes |
| Customer prepay | None (0%). Straight monthly billing from day one |
| Billing | Take-or-pay: 100% of GPU-hours billed for the full 36 months |
| Rate | Fixed flat for the full term. No escalator, no step-down |
| Rate source vs. term | B300: 36-mo 8-GPU listing. H200: Silicon Data index (no stated term). PRO 6000: 12-mo 8-GPU listing, held for 36 months |
| After month 36 | Not modeled. Payback is measured inside the initial term only |
We leave prepay out of the base case because prepayment terms vary widely from deal to deal. But prepay and tenor move payback more than the chip does. Here’s how much.
| Contract (tenor / prepay) | B300 | H200 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 yr / none | 27 | 22 | 22 |
| 3 yr / 15% | 24 | 19 | 18 |
| 3 yr / 25% | 22 | 15 | 14 |
| 5 yr / none | 32 | 26 | 27 |
| 5 yr / 15% | 25 | 18 | 17 |
| 5 yr / 25% | 19 | 11 | 7 |
Payback on capital at risk (capex less prepay), in months, estimated. Prepay is a share of total contract value, paid at signing and credited back evenly against billing. Five-year rates are scaled from the three-year rate using the steps in our B300 tenor ladder (about 15% lower).
Source: GPU Capital estimates.
Prepayment and tenor move payback more than the chip does
Months to pay back capital at risk (node cost less prepayment), by contract structure. Down any chip, the contract swings payback by 13 to 20 months; across any structure, the chip swings it by 5 to 12.
- 8x B300
- 8x H200
- 8x RTX PRO 6000
Prepay is a share of total contract value, paid at signing and credited back evenly against billing. Five-year rates are scaled from three-year rates using the steps in the B300 tenor ladder (about 15% lower).
Source: GPU Capital estimates from UpStation catalog prices (September 9, 2026), GetDeploying and Silicon Data rates (September 24 to 29, 2026) and one recent quote.
Show data
| Contract | 8x B300 | 8x H200 | 8x RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years, no prepay | 27 | 22 | 22 |
| 3 years, 15% prepay | 24 | 19 | 18 |
| 3 years, 25% prepay | 22 | 15 | 14 |
| 5 years, no prepay | 32 | 26 | 27 |
| 5 years, 15% prepay | 25 | 18 | 17 |
| 5 years, 25% prepay | 19 | 11 | 7 |
Read down any column: the contract swings payback by 13 to 20 months. Read across any row: the chip swings it by 5 to 12. Without prepay, a longer term is slower, because the lower locked rate costs more than the extra years add. With prepay, a longer term is faster, because the deposit is sized on a bigger contract. On the PRO 6000, a 25% prepay on five years is about 83% of the node’s cost. At that point the customer is financing the box.
The three nodes
Same GPU count. Very different machines.
| Specification | 8× B300 (HGX) | 8× H200 (HGX) | 8× RTX PRO 6000 Server Ed. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Blackwell Ultra | Hopper | Blackwell |
| Memory / GPU | 288 GB HBM3e (about 270 GB usable) | 141 GB HBM3e | 96 GB GDDR7 |
| Bandwidth / GPU | Up to 8 TB/s | 4.8 TB/s | 1.6 TB/s |
| GPU power | About 1,100 W air-cooled, up to about 1,400 W liquid-cooled | Up to 700 W | Up to 600 W |
| Interconnect | NVLink 5 (1.8 TB/s GPU-GPU) | NVLink 4 (900 GB/s) | PCIe Gen5, no NVLink |
| Cooling | Air or direct liquid cooling, by server model | Air | Air (passive cards) |
| Node nameplate power | 13.6 kW | 9.1 kW | 6.8 kW |
| Node capex (base case) | $572,364 | $319,422 | $125,000 |
| Capex per GPU (derived) | $71,546 | $39,928 | $15,625 |
B300 node power is the 13.6 kW nameplate of the Supermicro build priced here; NVIDIA lists about 14 kW for a DGX B300 system, which would leave B300 payback at about 27 months. Air-cooled B300 servers run the GPUs at about 1,100 W each; liquid-cooled servers run them at up to about 1,400 W.
Source: NVIDIA HGX platform, NVIDIA HGX reference architecture (H200/B300 memory and bandwidth), NVIDIA H200, NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition datasheet (PDF). B300 power and cooling per NVIDIA DGX B300, Supermicro and Dell (air-cooled) and Thunder Compute (liquid-cooled). B300 and H200 capex and all nameplate power: UpStation published catalog (Supermicro builds, prices as of September 9, 2026). RTX PRO 6000 capex: a recent quote in our deal flow.
B300 and H200 are single-node list prices. Volume buys come in lower. Jarvislabs puts an H200 at $30K to $40K per GPU to buy (August 2026), so $319K sits at the top of that range.
The PRO 6000 is where list and market part ways. The same catalog lists a Tier 1 node at $191,888 and a Tier 2 build at $163,910. We were recently quoted $125K. We use the quote, and show what list does to payback further down.
The HGX figures leave out fabric (800G for B300, 400G for H200), storage and install, so real HGX payback runs longer. The PRO 6000 is a PCIe inference box. No fabric needed.
Rental rates: use contract, not on-demand
Headlines quote on-demand. Lenders get paid on contract. The gap is wide.
| $/GPU-hr (late September 2026) | B300 | H200 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand median | $7.89 | $4.48 | $2.19 |
| Reserved median (all terms) | $5.97 | $3.79 | $1.83 |
| Long-tenor 8-GPU listings | $4.58 and $5.49 (36-mo) | $4.47 (36-mo, SXM) | $1.39 (12-mo) |
| Other data points | Reserved floor $4.25 | Silicon Data index $3.10; 1× 36-mo from $2.57 | 1-mo 8× reserved $1.27 |
| Base case used | $4.58 | $3.10 | $1.39 |
| Base ÷ on-demand | 0.58× | 0.69× | 0.63× |
Sources, all GetDeploying unless noted, pulled September 24 to 29, 2026: B300 listings; B300 on-demand median; B300 reserved and PRO 6000 medians; H200 listings and medians; RTX PRO 6000 listings; Silicon Data H200 index.
For B300 we take the low end of published 36-month 8-GPU listings. Our own tenor ladder has a three-year lock at $4.80, so $4.58 is the low side of where contracts actually print.
For the PRO 6000, 12 months is the longest published 8-GPU tenor we found. A true three-year lock would likely price lower.
Direction matters too. The AIMultiple index shows its latest-generation group median going from $2.12 in October 2024 to $4.72 in September 2026. Rates are firm. That’s the risk: firm rates are when people underwrite the top of the cycle.
Operating costs
| Input | Assumption | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Hours / month | 730 | Calendar |
| Billed utilization | 100% | Take-or-pay contract: billed whether the GPUs run or not |
| Colo (all-in, per node) | B300 $3,816; H200 $2,552; PRO 6000 $1,906 per month | UpStation power & colo: $225/kW-mo, 3-yr term, billed on provisioned kW (nameplate ÷ 0.8) |
| Ops & support reserve | 5% of revenue | Estimate: RMA, remote hands, monitoring |
| Excluded | Fabric, storage, financing, taxes, operator fees, residual value | Kept out to isolate node-level payback |
The payback math
Simple payback: node capex divided by monthly net cash. Every output below is an estimate built from the inputs above.
| Per node, per month | 8× B300 | 8× H200 | 8× RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate ($/GPU-hr) | $4.58 | $3.10 | $1.39 |
| Revenue (8 × rate × 730 × 100%) | $26,747 | $18,104 | $8,118 |
| Colo | ($3,816) | ($2,552) | ($1,906) |
| Ops reserve (5%) | ($1,337) | ($905) | ($406) |
| Net cash flow | $21,594 | $14,647 | $5,806 |
| Capex | $572,364 | $319,422 | $125,000 |
| Simple payback | 27 mo | 22 mo | 22 mo |
| Annual net cash ÷ capex | 45% | 55% | 56% |
| Rate needed for 36-mo payback | $3.55 | $2.06 | $0.97 |
| Cushion vs. base rate | −22% | −34% | −30% |
Source: GPU Capital estimates from the inputs in Exhibits 1, 4, 5 and 6.
The B300 earns 1.5× the monthly cash of an H200 on 1.8× the capital. That’s why it finishes last. The H200 gets there in under 22 months with the widest margin for error. For a lender, that counts more than the headline.
The PRO 6000 ties the H200, but only at $125K. At the $163,910 Tier 2 list, payback stretches to about 28 months. At $191,888 Tier 1, about 33 (est.). On this node, the purchase price is the whole trade.
What breaks each case
Three stress tests. One input moves, the rest hold at base.
Rate compression (one-time cut to the contract rate)
This is a single re-price, not an annual decline. Annual decay is the third table.
| Payback (months, est.) | Base | −10% | −20% | −30% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B300 | 27 | 30 | 35 | 41 |
| H200 | 22 | 25 | 29 | 34 |
| RTX PRO 6000 | 22 | 25 | 29 | 36 |
Source: GPU Capital estimates.
The H200 has the widest cushion against a cut in the contract rate
Payback in months after a single, one-time cut to the contract rate. Payback stays inside 36 months up to about a 34% cut for the H200, 30% for the RTX PRO 6000 and 22% for the B300.
Dots mark the cut at which each node’s payback reaches the 36-month term. A 10-point drop in billed utilization moves payback exactly as a 10% rate cut does, because costs are fixed.
Source: GPU Capital estimates from UpStation catalog prices (September 9, 2026), GetDeploying and Silicon Data rates (September 24 to 29, 2026) and one recent quote.
Show data
| One-time cut to the contract rate | 8x B300 | 8x H200 | 8x RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0% cut | 27 | 22 | 22 |
| 10% cut | 30 | 25 | 25 |
| 20% cut | 35 | 29 | 29 |
| 30% cut | 41 | 34 | 36 |
| 40% cut | 50 | 41 | 46 |
Utilization drop (rate held at base)
| Payback (months, est.) | 100% | 90% | 80% | 70% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B300 | 27 | 30 | 35 | 41 |
| H200 | 22 | 25 | 29 | 34 |
| RTX PRO 6000 | 22 | 25 | 29 | 36 |
Source: GPU Capital estimates.
Same numbers, and not by accident. With costs fixed, a ten-point drop in billed hours does exactly what a 10% rate cut does. On a take-or-pay contract, utilization risk only shows up if the customer stops paying, or when the contract rolls and the node has to be re-rented.
Rate decays every year from day one
| Payback (months, est.) | 0%/yr | 10%/yr | 20%/yr | 30%/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B300 | 27 | 31 | 40 | Never |
| H200 | 22 | 25 | 30 | 46 |
| RTX PRO 6000 | 22 | 25 | 31 | Never |
Source: GPU Capital estimates.
“Never” means cumulative cash never catches up to capex on that decay path. This is the case for short contracts that re-price as the market falls.
Where each node fails
B300 fails on the rate you lock. The 36-month breakeven is $3.55. The lowest reserved B300 listing today is $4.25, so there’s room, but the least of the three.
It’s also the most concentrated bet: $572K per node before a single optic. And Vera Rubin is already shipping. The H100’s posted rate fell from more than $7 in early 2024 to under $3 this year (GPU Appraisals, our affiliated appraisal practice). Expect the B300 to walk the same path, faster. At 30% a year it never pays back.
H200 fails on duration. Breakeven is $2.06. The cheapest published 36-month H200 commit is $2.57 (GetDeploying), 25% above that line. It’s the only node that pays back at all under 30% annual decay. Its risk is the roll. When the contract ends, it re-rents two generations behind the frontier.
RTX PRO 6000 fails on purchase price. At $125K it’s as robust as the H200 on a one-time cut. At list, it isn’t. And the spot market already trades close to its $0.97 breakeven: 1-month 8-GPU reservations list at $1.27, and single-GPU reserved floors go lower. An uncontracted PRO 6000 is exposed.
Buying at $125K is getting harder. Thunder Compute reports NVIDIA’s list price for the card at $16,000, up from an $8,565 launch MSRP, on GDDR7 shortages.
What we take from this
There’s no single winner. The PRO 6000 pays back fastest whenever the customer prepays. The H200 pays back fastest in every stress case. The B300 is last in every scenario we ran.
The H200 is the node we’d underwrite first today. Near-fastest payback, the widest rate cushion, and the only node that still pays back at 30% annual decay. The risk sits after the contract, not during it.
The RTX PRO 6000 matches it, but only when bought well below list. At $125K it’s a strong node. At $190K it’s a three-year trade with little room. Price the purchase before you price the rental.
The B300 pays back last and has the thinnest cushion. It needs a long contract near today’s rates and a customer strong enough to hold it through Rubin.
The rule we apply across all three: underwrite the contract and the price you paid, not the chip.
And payback is one lens, not the answer. Residual value, fabric capex and counterparty credit all move the result. That’s why GPU Capital screens nodes on the GPU Capital Yield Score alongside payback.
Sources
- NVIDIA, HGX platform nvidia.com
- NVIDIA, HGX reference architecture (H200 and B300 memory and bandwidth) docs.nvidia.com
- NVIDIA, H200 nvidia.com
- NVIDIA, RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition datasheet (PDF) akamai.com
- NVIDIA, DGX B300 (system power) nvidia.com
- Supermicro, SYS-822GS-NB3RT air-cooled HGX B300 server supermicro.com
- Dell, PowerEdge XE9780 (air-cooled HGX B300) dell.com
- Thunder Compute, NVIDIA B300 pricing thundercompute.com
- UpStation, published catalog (Supermicro builds, September 9, 2026) ai.upstation.io
- UpStation, power and colocation pricing ai.upstation.io
- Jarvislabs, H200 price (August 2026) jarvislabs.ai
- GetDeploying, B300 listings getdeploying.com
- GetDeploying, B300 vs H200 (B300 on-demand median) getdeploying.com
- GetDeploying, B300 vs RTX PRO 6000 (B300 reserved and PRO 6000 medians) getdeploying.com
- GetDeploying, H200 listings and medians getdeploying.com
- GetDeploying, RTX PRO 6000 listings getdeploying.com
- Silicon Data, H200 rental index silicondata.com
- AIMultiple, GPU rental price index aimultiple.com
- GPU Appraisals (an affiliate of GPU Capital), H100 residual value in 2026 gpuappraisals.com
- Thunder Compute, NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 pricing thundercompute.com
- GPU Capital, long-tenor prepaid GPU contracts (the B300 tenor ladder) gpu-capital.com
Quoted for market context. Apart from GPU Appraisals, an affiliate of GPU Capital, these companies are not affiliated with GPU Capital and do not endorse it.
Updated October 30, 2026. We corrected the B300 entries in the node table. B300 servers are sold both air-cooled, with GPUs at about 1,100 W, and liquid-cooled, at up to about 1,400 W, and about 270 GB of each GPU’s 288 GB of memory is usable. The payback estimates do not change. We also reworded our reason for leaving prepayments out of the base case, and corrected a sentence that placed RTX PRO 6000 spot prices below its breakeven rate.
Disclosure
This post is general market commentary for information only. It reflects the author’s views on the date shown, which may change. It is not investment advice, and it is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. GPU Capital, its funds or its affiliates may have relationships with, or interests in, companies or equipment mentioned.
Financing for GPU servers, sized for neoclouds.
$1M to $5M per deployment, as full-stack ownership or a first-lien or second-lien loan. You work directly with our Managing Partner, who makes credit decisions.
Financing is subject to our due diligence, credit approval, available capital and signed final agreements. Nothing on this website is a commitment to lend or lease.
Booking uses Calendly, a third-party scheduling service. Calendly’s privacy policy applies to the information you enter there.