Operators

B300 vs H200 vs RTX PRO 6000: which GPU server pays back fastest?

The payback math for three 8-GPU servers on the same three-year contract, and what breaks each case. The contract moves the answer more than the chip does.

Managing Partner, GPU Capital

Published
Updated
Reading time
9 min read

Key takeaways

  • On a three-year contract with no prepayment, we estimate an 8-GPU RTX PRO 6000 or H200 node recovers its cost in about 22 months, and a B300 node in about 27.
  • The contract moves payback more than the chip: tenor and prepayment swing it by 13 to 20 months, the choice of chip by 5 to 12.
  • The H200 has the widest cushion. Its contract rate can fall 34% before payback passes 36 months, against 30% for the RTX PRO 6000 and 22% for the B300.
  • Underwrite the contract and the price paid, not the chip. These are market estimates from public data, not results or projections for any investment.
Contents

The short version

On a three-year contract at today’s rates, the RTX PRO 6000 and the H200 pay back in a dead heat: about 22 months each. The B300 needs about 27. All three are our estimates, and the arithmetic is below.

Change the contract and the winner changes. The PRO 6000 wins when the customer prepays. The H200 wins when the market turns. The B300 wins nowhere at today’s rates.

The H200 wins on cushion. Its contract rate can fall 34% before payback slips past 36 months. The PRO 6000 can take 30%. The B300, 22%.

We see all three in our deal flow, and we underwrite them the same way: at the node. The 8-GPU server is what gets bought, racked, rented and financed.

Deal terms we assume

Every base-case number rests on one contract structure.

Exhibit 1Deal terms behind every base-case number
Exhibit 1. Deal terms behind every base-case number
Term Assumption
Initial contract term 36 months, all three nodes
Customer prepay None (0%). Straight monthly billing from day one
Billing Take-or-pay: 100% of GPU-hours billed for the full 36 months
Rate Fixed flat for the full term. No escalator, no step-down
Rate source vs. term B300: 36-mo 8-GPU listing. H200: Silicon Data index (no stated term). PRO 6000: 12-mo 8-GPU listing, held for 36 months
After month 36 Not modeled. Payback is measured inside the initial term only

We leave prepay out of the base case because prepayment terms vary widely from deal to deal. But prepay and tenor move payback more than the chip does. Here’s how much.

Exhibit 2, estimatedPayback in months, by contract structure
Exhibit 2. Payback in months, by contract structure
Contract (tenor / prepay) B300 H200 RTX PRO 6000
3 yr / none 27 22 22
3 yr / 15% 24 19 18
3 yr / 25% 22 15 14
5 yr / none 32 26 27
5 yr / 15% 25 18 17
5 yr / 25% 19 11 7

Payback on capital at risk (capex less prepay), in months, estimated. Prepay is a share of total contract value, paid at signing and credited back evenly against billing. Five-year rates are scaled from the three-year rate using the steps in our B300 tenor ladder (about 15% lower).

Source: GPU Capital estimates.

Exhibit 3, estimated

Prepayment and tenor move payback more than the chip does

Months to pay back capital at risk (node cost less prepayment), by contract structure. Down any chip, the contract swings payback by 13 to 20 months; across any structure, the chip swings it by 5 to 12.

  • 8x B300
  • 8x H200
  • 8x RTX PRO 6000
Prepayment and tenor move payback more than the chip doesGrouped bar chart of 8x B300, 8x H200, 8x RTX PRO 6000 for 3 years, no prepay, 3 years, 15% prepay, 3 years, 25% prepay, 5 years, no prepay, 5 years, 15% prepay, 5 years, 25% prepay. The data table lists every value.2722223 years, no prepay2419183 years, 15%prepay2215143 years, 25%prepay3226275 years, no prepay2518175 years, 15%prepay191175 years, 25%prepayPrepayment and tenor move payback more than the chip doesGrouped bar chart of 8x B300, 8x H200, 8x RTX PRO 6000 for 3 years, no prepay, 3 years, 15% prepay, 3 years, 25% prepay, 5 years, no prepay, 5 years, 15% prepay, 5 years, 25% prepay. The data table lists every value.3 years, no prepay3 years, 15% prepay3 years, 25% prepay5 years, no prepay5 years, 15% prepay5 years, 25% prepay27222224191822151432262725181719117

Prepay is a share of total contract value, paid at signing and credited back evenly against billing. Five-year rates are scaled from three-year rates using the steps in the B300 tenor ladder (about 15% lower).

Source: GPU Capital estimates from UpStation catalog prices (September 9, 2026), GetDeploying and Silicon Data rates (September 24 to 29, 2026) and one recent quote.

Show data
Prepayment and tenor move payback more than the chip does
Contract8x B3008x H2008x RTX PRO 6000
3 years, no prepay272222
3 years, 15% prepay241918
3 years, 25% prepay221514
5 years, no prepay322627
5 years, 15% prepay251817
5 years, 25% prepay19117

Read down any column: the contract swings payback by 13 to 20 months. Read across any row: the chip swings it by 5 to 12. Without prepay, a longer term is slower, because the lower locked rate costs more than the extra years add. With prepay, a longer term is faster, because the deposit is sized on a bigger contract. On the PRO 6000, a 25% prepay on five years is about 83% of the node’s cost. At that point the customer is financing the box.

The three nodes

Same GPU count. Very different machines.

Exhibit 4The three 8-GPU nodes
Exhibit 4. The three 8-GPU nodes
Specification 8× B300 (HGX) 8× H200 (HGX) 8× RTX PRO 6000 Server Ed.
Architecture Blackwell Ultra Hopper Blackwell
Memory / GPU 288 GB HBM3e (about 270 GB usable) 141 GB HBM3e 96 GB GDDR7
Bandwidth / GPU Up to 8 TB/s 4.8 TB/s 1.6 TB/s
GPU power About 1,100 W air-cooled, up to about 1,400 W liquid-cooled Up to 700 W Up to 600 W
Interconnect NVLink 5 (1.8 TB/s GPU-GPU) NVLink 4 (900 GB/s) PCIe Gen5, no NVLink
Cooling Air or direct liquid cooling, by server model Air Air (passive cards)
Node nameplate power 13.6 kW 9.1 kW 6.8 kW
Node capex (base case) $572,364 $319,422 $125,000
Capex per GPU (derived) $71,546 $39,928 $15,625

B300 node power is the 13.6 kW nameplate of the Supermicro build priced here; NVIDIA lists about 14 kW for a DGX B300 system, which would leave B300 payback at about 27 months. Air-cooled B300 servers run the GPUs at about 1,100 W each; liquid-cooled servers run them at up to about 1,400 W.

Source: NVIDIA HGX platform, NVIDIA HGX reference architecture (H200/B300 memory and bandwidth), NVIDIA H200, NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition datasheet (PDF). B300 power and cooling per NVIDIA DGX B300, Supermicro and Dell (air-cooled) and Thunder Compute (liquid-cooled). B300 and H200 capex and all nameplate power: UpStation published catalog (Supermicro builds, prices as of September 9, 2026). RTX PRO 6000 capex: a recent quote in our deal flow.

B300 and H200 are single-node list prices. Volume buys come in lower. Jarvislabs puts an H200 at $30K to $40K per GPU to buy (August 2026), so $319K sits at the top of that range.

The PRO 6000 is where list and market part ways. The same catalog lists a Tier 1 node at $191,888 and a Tier 2 build at $163,910. We were recently quoted $125K. We use the quote, and show what list does to payback further down.

The HGX figures leave out fabric (800G for B300, 400G for H200), storage and install, so real HGX payback runs longer. The PRO 6000 is a PCIe inference box. No fabric needed.

Rental rates: use contract, not on-demand

Headlines quote on-demand. Lenders get paid on contract. The gap is wide.

Exhibit 5Rental rates by node, dollars per GPU-hour, late September 2026
Exhibit 5. Rental rates by node, dollars per GPU-hour, late September 2026
$/GPU-hr (late September 2026) B300 H200 RTX PRO 6000
On-demand median $7.89 $4.48 $2.19
Reserved median (all terms) $5.97 $3.79 $1.83
Long-tenor 8-GPU listings $4.58 and $5.49 (36-mo) $4.47 (36-mo, SXM) $1.39 (12-mo)
Other data points Reserved floor $4.25 Silicon Data index $3.10; 1× 36-mo from $2.57 1-mo 8× reserved $1.27
Base case used $4.58 $3.10 $1.39
Base ÷ on-demand 0.58× 0.69× 0.63×

For B300 we take the low end of published 36-month 8-GPU listings. Our own tenor ladder has a three-year lock at $4.80, so $4.58 is the low side of where contracts actually print.

For the PRO 6000, 12 months is the longest published 8-GPU tenor we found. A true three-year lock would likely price lower.

Direction matters too. The AIMultiple index shows its latest-generation group median going from $2.12 in October 2024 to $4.72 in September 2026. Rates are firm. That’s the risk: firm rates are when people underwrite the top of the cycle.

Operating costs

Exhibit 6Operating cost inputs, per node
Exhibit 6. Operating cost inputs, per node
Input Assumption Basis
Hours / month 730 Calendar
Billed utilization 100% Take-or-pay contract: billed whether the GPUs run or not
Colo (all-in, per node) B300 $3,816; H200 $2,552; PRO 6000 $1,906 per month UpStation power & colo: $225/kW-mo, 3-yr term, billed on provisioned kW (nameplate ÷ 0.8)
Ops & support reserve 5% of revenue Estimate: RMA, remote hands, monitoring
Excluded Fabric, storage, financing, taxes, operator fees, residual value Kept out to isolate node-level payback

The payback math

Simple payback: node capex divided by monthly net cash. Every output below is an estimate built from the inputs above.

Exhibit 7, estimatedPayback per node, per month
Exhibit 7. Payback per node, per month
Per node, per month 8× B300 8× H200 8× RTX PRO 6000
Rate ($/GPU-hr) $4.58 $3.10 $1.39
Revenue (8 × rate × 730 × 100%) $26,747 $18,104 $8,118
Colo ($3,816) ($2,552) ($1,906)
Ops reserve (5%) ($1,337) ($905) ($406)
Net cash flow $21,594 $14,647 $5,806
Capex $572,364 $319,422 $125,000
Simple payback 27 mo 22 mo 22 mo
Annual net cash ÷ capex 45% 55% 56%
Rate needed for 36-mo payback $3.55 $2.06 $0.97
Cushion vs. base rate −22% −34% −30%

Source: GPU Capital estimates from the inputs in Exhibits 1, 4, 5 and 6.

Exhibit 8, estimated

The H200 and RTX PRO 6000 pay back in about 22 months, the B300 in 27

Simple payback in months for one 8-GPU node on a 36-month take-or-pay contract with no prepayment, at late-September 2026 contract rates.

The H200 and RTX PRO 6000 pay back in about 22 months, the B300 in 27Bar chart. 8x H200 (HGX): 22 months; 8x RTX PRO 6000: 22 months; 8x B300 (HGX): 27 months.8x H200 (HGX)8x RTX PRO 60008x B300 (HGX)22 months22 months27 months36-month contractThe H200 and RTX PRO 6000 pay back in about 22 months, the B300 in 27Bar chart. 8x H200 (HGX): 22 months; 8x RTX PRO 6000: 22 months; 8x B300 (HGX): 27 months.8x H200 (HGX)8x RTX PRO 60008x B300 (HGX)22 months22 months27 months36-month contract

Source: GPU Capital estimates from UpStation catalog prices (September 9, 2026), GetDeploying and Silicon Data rates (September 24 to 29, 2026) and one recent quote.

Show data
The H200 and RTX PRO 6000 pay back in about 22 months, the B300 in 27
NodeMonths to payback
8x H200 (HGX)22 months
8x RTX PRO 600022 months
8x B300 (HGX)27 months

The B300 earns 1.5× the monthly cash of an H200 on 1.8× the capital. That’s why it finishes last. The H200 gets there in under 22 months with the widest margin for error. For a lender, that counts more than the headline.

The PRO 6000 ties the H200, but only at $125K. At the $163,910 Tier 2 list, payback stretches to about 28 months. At $191,888 Tier 1, about 33 (est.). On this node, the purchase price is the whole trade.

What breaks each case

Three stress tests. One input moves, the rest hold at base.

Rate compression (one-time cut to the contract rate)

This is a single re-price, not an annual decline. Annual decay is the third table.

Exhibit 9, estimatedPayback after a one-time cut to the contract rate, months
Exhibit 9. Payback after a one-time cut to the contract rate, months
Payback (months, est.) Base −10% −20% −30%
B300 27 30 35 41
H200 22 25 29 34
RTX PRO 6000 22 25 29 36

Source: GPU Capital estimates.

Exhibit 10, estimated

The H200 has the widest cushion against a cut in the contract rate

Payback in months after a single, one-time cut to the contract rate. Payback stays inside 36 months up to about a 34% cut for the H200, 30% for the RTX PRO 6000 and 22% for the B300.

The H200 has the widest cushion against a cut in the contract rateLine chart of 8x B300 and 8x H200 and 8x RTX PRO 6000. The data table lists the values.20304050Months to paybackBase rate10% cut20% cut30% cut40% cutOne-time cut to the contract rate36-month contract8x B3008x RTX PRO 60008x H20022%30%34%The H200 has the widest cushion against a cut in the contract rateLine chart of 8x B300 and 8x H200 and 8x RTX PRO 6000. The data table lists the values.20304050Months to paybackBase rate20% cut40% cutOne-time cut to the contract rate36-month contract8x B3008x RTX PRO 60008x H20022%30%34%

Dots mark the cut at which each node’s payback reaches the 36-month term. A 10-point drop in billed utilization moves payback exactly as a 10% rate cut does, because costs are fixed.

Source: GPU Capital estimates from UpStation catalog prices (September 9, 2026), GetDeploying and Silicon Data rates (September 24 to 29, 2026) and one recent quote.

Show data
The H200 has the widest cushion against a cut in the contract rate
One-time cut to the contract rate8x B3008x H2008x RTX PRO 6000
0% cut272222
10% cut302525
20% cut352929
30% cut413436
40% cut504146

Utilization drop (rate held at base)

Exhibit 11, estimatedPayback at lower billed utilization, months
Exhibit 11. Payback at lower billed utilization, months
Payback (months, est.) 100% 90% 80% 70%
B300 27 30 35 41
H200 22 25 29 34
RTX PRO 6000 22 25 29 36

Source: GPU Capital estimates.

Same numbers, and not by accident. With costs fixed, a ten-point drop in billed hours does exactly what a 10% rate cut does. On a take-or-pay contract, utilization risk only shows up if the customer stops paying, or when the contract rolls and the node has to be re-rented.

Rate decays every year from day one

Exhibit 12, estimatedPayback when the rate falls every year, months
Exhibit 12. Payback when the rate falls every year, months
Payback (months, est.) 0%/yr 10%/yr 20%/yr 30%/yr
B300 27 31 40 Never
H200 22 25 30 46
RTX PRO 6000 22 25 31 Never

Source: GPU Capital estimates.

“Never” means cumulative cash never catches up to capex on that decay path. This is the case for short contracts that re-price as the market falls.

Where each node fails

B300 fails on the rate you lock. The 36-month breakeven is $3.55. The lowest reserved B300 listing today is $4.25, so there’s room, but the least of the three.

It’s also the most concentrated bet: $572K per node before a single optic. And Vera Rubin is already shipping. The H100’s posted rate fell from more than $7 in early 2024 to under $3 this year (GPU Appraisals, our affiliated appraisal practice). Expect the B300 to walk the same path, faster. At 30% a year it never pays back.

H200 fails on duration. Breakeven is $2.06. The cheapest published 36-month H200 commit is $2.57 (GetDeploying), 25% above that line. It’s the only node that pays back at all under 30% annual decay. Its risk is the roll. When the contract ends, it re-rents two generations behind the frontier.

RTX PRO 6000 fails on purchase price. At $125K it’s as robust as the H200 on a one-time cut. At list, it isn’t. And the spot market already trades close to its $0.97 breakeven: 1-month 8-GPU reservations list at $1.27, and single-GPU reserved floors go lower. An uncontracted PRO 6000 is exposed.

Buying at $125K is getting harder. Thunder Compute reports NVIDIA’s list price for the card at $16,000, up from an $8,565 launch MSRP, on GDDR7 shortages.

What we take from this

There’s no single winner. The PRO 6000 pays back fastest whenever the customer prepays. The H200 pays back fastest in every stress case. The B300 is last in every scenario we ran.

The H200 is the node we’d underwrite first today. Near-fastest payback, the widest rate cushion, and the only node that still pays back at 30% annual decay. The risk sits after the contract, not during it.

The RTX PRO 6000 matches it, but only when bought well below list. At $125K it’s a strong node. At $190K it’s a three-year trade with little room. Price the purchase before you price the rental.

The B300 pays back last and has the thinnest cushion. It needs a long contract near today’s rates and a customer strong enough to hold it through Rubin.

The rule we apply across all three: underwrite the contract and the price you paid, not the chip.

And payback is one lens, not the answer. Residual value, fabric capex and counterparty credit all move the result. That’s why GPU Capital screens nodes on the GPU Capital Yield Score alongside payback.

Sources

Quoted for market context. Apart from GPU Appraisals, an affiliate of GPU Capital, these companies are not affiliated with GPU Capital and do not endorse it.

Updated October 30, 2026. We corrected the B300 entries in the node table. B300 servers are sold both air-cooled, with GPUs at about 1,100 W, and liquid-cooled, at up to about 1,400 W, and about 270 GB of each GPU’s 288 GB of memory is usable. The payback estimates do not change. We also reworded our reason for leaving prepayments out of the base case, and corrected a sentence that placed RTX PRO 6000 spot prices below its breakeven rate.

About the author

Marek Omilian, CFA

Managing Partner, GPU Capital

Marek Omilian, CFA, is Managing Partner of GPU Capital, which finances NVIDIA GPU servers for AI cloud providers through full-stack ownership, where the fund owns the servers and leases them to the operator, and first-lien or second-lien loans. He has 30 years of experience in valuation and 15 years working with Microsoft and its data center partners on both the supply and the demand side of compute infrastructure. He has invested personally in 10 GPU equipment projects.

He also leads GPU Appraisals, an appraisal practice of Value Prism Consulting that is affiliated with GPU Capital. Its valuations of equipment GPU Capital owns or finances are not independent; see conflicts of interest. Microsoft is not affiliated with GPU Capital.

About Marek Omilian

Disclosure

This post is general market commentary for information only. It reflects the author’s views on the date shown, which may change. It is not investment advice, and it is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. GPU Capital, its funds or its affiliates may have relationships with, or interests in, companies or equipment mentioned.

Financing for GPU servers, sized for neoclouds.

$1M to $5M per deployment, as full-stack ownership or a first-lien or second-lien loan. You work directly with our Managing Partner, who makes credit decisions.

Financing is subject to our due diligence, credit approval, available capital and signed final agreements. Nothing on this website is a commitment to lend or lease.

Booking uses Calendly, a third-party scheduling service. Calendly’s privacy policy applies to the information you enter there.